Impact of NAFTA on Canada: Introduction and Basis of ResearchSave this online in Del.icio.us. [?] Vote For this Post
Without further ado, I present the Introduction and basis of my research on NAFTA'S economic impact on Canadians.
The word "economics" comes from the ancient Greek words "oikos" and "nomos," which mean, respectively, the "family estate" and "laws of man" (as opposed to "physis," the laws of nature). One can reasonably infer from this knowledge that economics has existed in some form since even Antiquity. It follows that there a multiplicity of economic theories must have been created and expounded upon since then. Since Adam Smith's famous "Wealth of Nations," modern economics has focused on measuring the health of national economies. More recently, this macroeconomic approach to things has been contrasted with microeconomics, whose focus is on the transfer of wealth on a smaller, individual scale. An example of such contrasts are the contemporary measures of economic well-being: GDP and GDP per capita represent the macroeconomic approach to calculating wealth, while the Household Savings Rate and Average Income are important representatives of the microeconomic approach.
Judgements are based on criteria. To ensure sound analysis, the criteria used must be relevant to the issue at hand, and should account for as much data as possible. Thus in order to determine the effect of any particular economic actor, one should use measures of economic performance, which ought to be drawn from both the worlds of macro- and microeconomics. These are the means proposed to assess the impact of NAFTA on the Canadian nation, and on Canadians as individuals.
To be more specific, the data reported by the following measures of economic health is that data which will be used to weigh up the economic outcome of NAFTA in Canada. The measures are: GDP (Gross Domestic Product), GDP/Capita, National Savings Rate, Household Savings Rate, Unemployment Rate, Labour Productivity, and.
Two likely measures have been left off this list, namely the Current Account and Investment Rates. In the case of the former, the omission is due to the fact that measuring a nation's balance of trade is outdated, and doesn't give a true indication of economic welfare. In the case of the latter, the omission is due to my inability to find the relevant data.
If you enjoyed the post, you may want to subscribe to our newsletter. Other options (links below) include reading some suggested posts on related subjects or picking your own related material to read from the archives. A free copy of the full text (including commentaries not available on this site) of the research findings on NAFTA is offered to subscribers.
Posts relating to Economics and NAFTA:
- GDP and GDP per capita since NAFTA - Next in the series.
- Unemployment in Canada since NAFTA
- Outline of the impact of NAFTA on Canadians' research project (discusses non-economic criteria for evaluation)